AI video model comparison
Grok Imagine 1.5 vs Wan 3.0 Prime
Wan 3.0 Prime is 1% cheaper (price per second at 720p: Grok Imagine 1.5 $0.36/s vs Wan 3.0 Prime $0.36/s). Grok Imagine 1.5 has the cheapest clip and faster renders. Wan 3.0 Prime has longer clips, more reference images and native audio.
| Price | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cheapest second | $0.21/s | $0.17/s (best) |
| Per second at 480p | $0.21/s | $0.17/s (best) |
| Per second at 720p | $0.36/s | $0.36/s (best) |
| Per second at 1080p | $0.64/s (best) | $0.71/s |
| Cheapest clip | $0.24 (best) | $0.35 |
| A 5-second clip at 720p | $1.81 | $1.79 (best) |
| A 10-second clip at 1080p | $6.40 (best) | $7.14 |
| Speed and length | ||
| Render time | ~30–54 sec (best) | ~1–3 min |
| Longest clip | 15s | 30s (best) |
| Clip lengths | 1–15s | 2–30s |
| Output | ||
| Top resolution | 1080p | 1080P |
| Frames | 1:1 · 16:9 · 9:16 · 4:3 · 3:4 · 3:2 · 2:3 | 16:9 · 4:3 · 1:1 · 3:4 · 9:16 |
| Sound | — | Native (best) |
| Inputs | ||
| Takes | 1Text · 1 image | 10Text · 10 images · 1 video · audio |
| Reference images | Up to 1 | Up to 10 (best) |
| Needs | A start image | A prompt |
| What it does | ||
| Can do | Image → video | Text → videoImage → videoFirst + last frameMulti-referenceVideo → videoAudio-driven |
| Good for | Fast drafts · Edgy creative · Memes | Value renders · Open ecosystem · Experimentation |
| Settings you control | Frame · Length · Resolution | Frame · Audio · Length · Document · Attachment role · Per-attachment roles · Web page · Expand prompt · Resolution · Seed · Watermark |
Same prompt, side by side
UGC selfie · the same prompt on every model
“A woman in her late twenties talks straight into her phone camera in a bright kitchen, handheld selfie framing, natural window light, she smiles and gestures mid-sentence, casual creator energy, no on-screen captions”
Product shot · the same prompt on every model
“Cinematic product shot: a matte black wireless earbud case turns slowly on a dark reflective surface, a single warm rim light sweeps across it, macro lens, shallow depth of field, slow push-in, plain unbranded case”
Which should you choose?
Choose Grok Imagine 1.5 if you want
- the cheapest clip
- faster renders
- fast drafts
- edgy creative
Choose Wan 3.0 Prime if you want
- a lower price per second at 720p
- longer clips
- more reference images
- native audio
- text → video, which the other cannot do
- first + last frame, which the other cannot do
- multi-reference, which the other cannot do
- video → video, which the other cannot do
- audio-driven, which the other cannot do
- value renders
- open ecosystem
More from each model
Grok Imagine 1.5
Compare with others
Grok Imagine 1.5 vs …
Grok Imagine 1.5 vs Veo 3.1
Grok Imagine 1.5 vs Seedance 2.5
Grok Imagine 1.5 vs Wan 3.0
Grok Imagine 1.5 vs Pruna P-Video 2 Pro Reference
Grok Imagine 1.5 vs Kling 3.0
Wan 3.0 Prime vs Seedance 2.0
Wan 3.0 Prime vs MiniMax H3
Wan 3.0 Prime vs Seedance 2.0 Fast
Wan 3.0 Prime vs Kling O1How we compare
- Prices come from the live catalog at the pay-as-you-go rate. The quote before you generate is binding. Plans and packs
- Render times are the catalog’s own estimate for one render.
- Every clip and image on this page was rendered on OpenClips.
Questions
Grok Imagine 1.5 vs Wan 3.0 Prime: questions
Wan 3.0 Prime costs the least here (price per second at 720p). Grok Imagine 1.5: $0.36/s. Wan 3.0 Prime: $0.36/s. Prices are at the pay-as-you-go rate. The quote before you generate is binding.
Grok Imagine 1.5 is the fastest here. Grok Imagine 1.5 takes ~30–54 sec. Wan 3.0 Prime takes ~1–3 min.
Grok Imagine 1.5 and Wan 3.0 Prime take a still as the first frame or a reference.
Grok Imagine 1.5 makes up to 15 seconds. Wan 3.0 Prime makes up to 30 seconds.
Wan 3.0 Prime renders native audio with the picture. Grok Imagine 1.5: silent.