AI video model comparison
Hailuo 2.3 vs Seedance 2.5
Hailuo 2.3 is 59% cheaper (price per second at 720p: Hailuo 2.3 $0.14/s vs Seedance 2.5 $0.35/s). Hailuo 2.3 has faster renders. Seedance 2.5 has the cheapest clip, longer clips, more reference images and native audio.
| Price | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cheapest second | $0.14/s (best) | $0.16/s |
| Per second at 480p | Not offered | $0.16/s |
| Per second at 720p | $0.14/s (best) | $0.35/s |
| Per second at 1080p | $0.14/s (best) | $0.86/s |
| Cheapest clip | $1.25 | $0.64 (best) |
| A 5-second clip at 720p | Not offered | $1.75 |
| A 10-second clip at 1080p | $1.44 (best) | $8.58 |
| Speed and length | ||
| Render time | ~1–4 min (best) | ~3–8 min |
| Longest clip | 10s | 30s (best) |
| Clip lengths | 6–10s | 4–30s |
| Output | ||
| Top resolution | 1080P | 1080p |
| Frames | Model default | 9:16 · 16:9 · 1:1 · 4:3 · 3:4 · 21:9 |
| Sound | — | Native (best) |
| Inputs | ||
| Takes | 1Text · 1 image | 30Text · 30 images · 1 video · audio |
| Reference images | Up to 1 | Up to 30 (best) |
| Needs | A prompt | A prompt |
| What it does | ||
| Can do | Text → videoImage → video | Text → videoImage → videoFirst + last frameMulti-referenceVideo → videoAudio-driven |
| Good for | Image to video · Fast drafts · 1080p | Cinematic scenes · Multi-reference · Product films |
| Settings you control | Length · Resolution | Frame · Draft preview · Draft to finalize · Length · Mode · Audio · Attachment role · Per-attachment roles · Negative prompt · File format · Resolution · Return last frame · Seed · Watermark |
Same prompt, side by side
UGC selfie · the same prompt on every model
“A woman in her late twenties talks straight into her phone camera in a bright kitchen, handheld selfie framing, natural window light, she smiles and gestures mid-sentence, casual creator energy, no on-screen captions”
Product shot · the same prompt on every model
“Cinematic product shot: a matte black wireless earbud case turns slowly on a dark reflective surface, a single warm rim light sweeps across it, macro lens, shallow depth of field, slow push-in, plain unbranded case”
Story beats · same subject, own prompts
Which should you choose?
Choose Hailuo 2.3 if you want
- a lower price per second at 720p
- faster renders
- image to video
- fast drafts
Choose Seedance 2.5 if you want
- the cheapest clip
- longer clips
- more reference images
- native audio
- first + last frame, which the other cannot do
- multi-reference, which the other cannot do
- video → video, which the other cannot do
- audio-driven, which the other cannot do
- cinematic scenes
More from each model
Hailuo 2.3
Seedance 2.5
Compare with others
Hailuo 2.3 vs …
How we compare
- Prices come from the live catalog at the pay-as-you-go rate. The quote before you generate is binding. Plans and packs
- Render times are the catalog’s own estimate for one render.
- Every clip and image on this page was rendered on OpenClips.
Questions
Hailuo 2.3 vs Seedance 2.5: questions
Hailuo 2.3 costs the least here (price per second at 720p). Hailuo 2.3: $0.14/s. Seedance 2.5: $0.35/s. Prices are at the pay-as-you-go rate. The quote before you generate is binding.
Hailuo 2.3 is the fastest here. Hailuo 2.3 takes ~1–4 min. Seedance 2.5 takes ~3–8 min.
Hailuo 2.3 and Seedance 2.5 take a still as the first frame or a reference.
Hailuo 2.3 makes up to 10 seconds. Seedance 2.5 makes up to 30 seconds.
Seedance 2.5 renders native audio with the picture. Hailuo 2.3: silent.