AI image model comparison
Seedream 5.0 Pro vs Wan 2.7 Image Pro
Seedream 5.0 Pro is 38% cheaper (price per image: Seedream 5.0 Pro $0.13 vs Wan 2.7 Image Pro $0.20). Seedream 5.0 Pro has more reference images. Wan 2.7 Image Pro has faster renders.
| Price | ||
|---|---|---|
| Price per image | $0.13 (best) | $0.20 |
| Per megapixel | Not offered | $0.012/MP |
| Speed and size | ||
| Render time | ~1–3 min | ~15 sec (best) |
| Largest output | Not stated | 16.8 MP |
| Sizes | — | — |
| Frames | 1:1 · 9:16 · 16:9 | Model default |
| Inputs | ||
| Reference images | Up to 10 (best) | Up to 9 |
| Takes | Text · 10 images | Text · 9 images |
| What it does | ||
| Edits a photo | Yes | Yes |
| Vector SVG | No | No |
| Can do | Text → imageImage references | Text → imageImage references |
| Good for | Posters · Typography · Key art | Value renders · Open ecosystem · Experimentation |
| Settings you control | Frame · File format · Size | Colour palette · Expand prompt · Seed · Size · Thinking mode · Watermark |
Output side by side
No image model has a same-prompt render yet. Compare the facts above.
Which should you choose?
Choose Seedream 5.0 Pro if you want
- a lower price per image
- more reference images
- posters
- typography
Choose Wan 2.7 Image Pro if you want
- faster renders
- value renders
- open ecosystem
Compare with others
Seedream 5.0 Pro vs …
How we compare
- Prices come from the live catalog at the pay-as-you-go rate. The quote before you generate is binding. Plans and packs
- Render times are the catalog’s own estimate for one render.
- Every clip and image on this page was rendered on OpenClips.
Questions
Seedream 5.0 Pro vs Wan 2.7 Image Pro: questions
Seedream 5.0 Pro costs the least here (price per image). Seedream 5.0 Pro: $0.13. Wan 2.7 Image Pro: $0.20. Prices are at the pay-as-you-go rate. The quote before you generate is binding.
Wan 2.7 Image Pro is the fastest here. Seedream 5.0 Pro takes ~1–3 min. Wan 2.7 Image Pro takes ~15 sec.
Seedream 5.0 Pro and Wan 2.7 Image Pro take a photo or reference images.
None of them. Each outputs a raster image.