AI video model comparison
Seedance 2.0 vs Veo 3.1
Seedance 2.0 is 78% cheaper (price per second at 720p: Seedance 2.0 $0.23/s vs Veo 3.1 $1.02/s). Seedance 2.0 has the cheapest clip, longer clips, a higher top resolution and more reference images. Veo 3.1 has faster renders.
| Price | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cheapest second | $0.10/s (best) | $1.02/s |
| Per second at 480p | $0.10/s | Not offered |
| Per second at 720p | $0.23/s (best) | $1.02/s |
| Per second at 1080p | $0.56/s (best) | $1.02/s |
| Per second at 4K | $1.17/s | Not offered |
| Cheapest clip | $0.41 (best) | $4.08 |
| A 5-second clip at 720p | $1.15 | Not offered |
| A 10-second clip at 1080p | $5.65 | Not offered |
| Speed and length | ||
| Render time | ~2–7 min | ~1–3 min (best) |
| Longest clip | 15s (best) | 8s |
| Clip lengths | 4–15s | 4–8s |
| Output | ||
| Top resolution | 4K (best) | 1080p |
| Frames | 9:16 · 16:9 · 1:1 · 4:3 · 3:4 · 21:9 | 16:9 · 9:16 |
| Sound | Native | Native |
| Inputs | ||
| Takes | 9Text · 9 images · 1 video · audio | 3Text · 3 images |
| Reference images | Up to 9 (best) | Up to 3 |
| Needs | A prompt | A prompt |
| What it does | ||
| Can do | Text → videoImage → videoFirst + last frameMulti-referenceVideo → videoAudio-driven | Text → videoImage → videoMulti-reference |
| Good for | Cinematic scenes · Multi-reference · Product films | Cinematic look · Native audio · Dialogue scenes |
| Settings you control | Frame · Length · Mode · Audio · Attachment role · Per-attachment roles · Negative prompt · Resolution · Return last frame · Seed · Watermark | Frame · Length · Audio · Negative prompt · People · Reference mode · Resolution · Seed |
Same prompt, side by side
UGC selfie · the same prompt on every model
“A woman in her late twenties talks straight into her phone camera in a bright kitchen, handheld selfie framing, natural window light, she smiles and gestures mid-sentence, casual creator energy, no on-screen captions”
Product shot · the same prompt on every model
“Cinematic product shot: a matte black wireless earbud case turns slowly on a dark reflective surface, a single warm rim light sweeps across it, macro lens, shallow depth of field, slow push-in, plain unbranded case”
Sound scenes · same subject, own prompts
Which should you choose?
Choose Seedance 2.0 if you want
- a lower price per second at 720p
- the cheapest clip
- longer clips
- a higher top resolution
- more reference images
- first + last frame, which the other cannot do
- video → video, which the other cannot do
- audio-driven, which the other cannot do
- cinematic scenes
- multi-reference
More from each model
Seedance 2.0
Veo 3.1
Compare with others
Seedance 2.0 vs …
How we compare
- Prices come from the live catalog at the pay-as-you-go rate. The quote before you generate is binding. Plans and packs
- Render times are the catalog’s own estimate for one render.
- Every clip and image on this page was rendered on OpenClips.
Questions
Seedance 2.0 vs Veo 3.1: questions
Seedance 2.0 costs the least here (price per second at 720p). Seedance 2.0: $0.23/s. Veo 3.1: $1.02/s. Prices are at the pay-as-you-go rate. The quote before you generate is binding.
Veo 3.1 is the fastest here. Seedance 2.0 takes ~2–7 min. Veo 3.1 takes ~1–3 min.
Seedance 2.0 and Veo 3.1 take a still as the first frame or a reference.
Seedance 2.0 makes up to 15 seconds. Veo 3.1 makes up to 8 seconds.
Seedance 2.0 and Veo 3.1 render native audio with the picture.