AI video model comparison
Seedance 2.0 vs Seedance 2.0 Fast
Seedance 2.0 Fast is 60% cheaper (price per second at 720p: Seedance 2.0 $0.23/s vs Seedance 2.0 Fast $0.091/s). Seedance 2.0 has a higher top resolution. Seedance 2.0 Fast has the cheapest clip and faster renders.
| Price | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cheapest second | $0.10/s | $0.041/s (best) |
| Per second at 480p | $0.10/s | $0.041/s (best) |
| Per second at 720p | $0.23/s | $0.091/s (best) |
| Per second at 1080p | $0.56/s | Not offered |
| Per second at 4K | $1.17/s | Not offered |
| Cheapest clip | $0.41 | $0.18 (best) |
| A 5-second clip at 720p | $1.15 | $0.46 (best) |
| A 10-second clip at 1080p | $5.65 | Not offered |
| Speed and length | ||
| Render time | ~2–7 min | ~2–5 min (best) |
| Longest clip | 15s | 15s |
| Clip lengths | 4–15s | 4–15s |
| Output | ||
| Top resolution | 4K (best) | 720p |
| Frames | 9:16 · 16:9 · 1:1 · 4:3 · 3:4 · 21:9 | 9:16 · 16:9 · 1:1 · 4:3 · 3:4 · 21:9 |
| Sound | Native | Native |
| Inputs | ||
| Takes | 9Text · 9 images · 1 video · audio | 9Text · 9 images · 1 video · audio |
| Reference images | Up to 9 | Up to 9 |
| Needs | A prompt | A prompt |
| What it does | ||
| Can do | Text → videoImage → videoFirst + last frameMulti-referenceVideo → videoAudio-driven | Text → videoImage → videoFirst + last frameMulti-referenceVideo → videoAudio-driven |
| Good for | Cinematic scenes · Multi-reference · Product films | Cinematic scenes · Multi-reference · Product films |
| Settings you control | Frame · Length · Mode · Audio · Attachment role · Per-attachment roles · Negative prompt · Resolution · Return last frame · Seed · Watermark | Frame · Length · Mode · Audio · Attachment role · Per-attachment roles · Negative prompt · Resolution · Return last frame · Seed · Watermark |
Same prompt, side by side
UGC selfie · the same prompt on every model
“A woman in her late twenties talks straight into her phone camera in a bright kitchen, handheld selfie framing, natural window light, she smiles and gestures mid-sentence, casual creator energy, no on-screen captions”
Product shot · the same prompt on every model
“Cinematic product shot: a matte black wireless earbud case turns slowly on a dark reflective surface, a single warm rim light sweeps across it, macro lens, shallow depth of field, slow push-in, plain unbranded case”
Which should you choose?
Choose Seedance 2.0 if you want
- a higher top resolution
- cinematic scenes
- multi-reference
Choose Seedance 2.0 Fast if you want
- a lower price per second at 720p
- the cheapest clip
- faster renders
- cinematic scenes
- multi-reference
More from each model
Seedance 2.0
Compare with others
Seedance 2.0 vs …
Seedance 2.0 vs Seedance 2.5
Seedance 2.0 vs Kling 3.0
Seedance 2.0 vs Veo 3.1
Seedance 2.0 vs Wan 3.0
Seedance 2.0 vs Wan 3.0 Prime
Seedance 2.0 vs MiniMax H3
Seedance 2.0 Fast vs Seedance 2.0 Mini
Seedance 2.0 Fast vs Kling O1How we compare
- Prices come from the live catalog at the pay-as-you-go rate. The quote before you generate is binding. Plans and packs
- Render times are the catalog’s own estimate for one render.
- Every clip and image on this page was rendered on OpenClips.
Questions
Seedance 2.0 vs Seedance 2.0 Fast: questions
Seedance 2.0 Fast costs the least here (price per second at 720p). Seedance 2.0: $0.23/s. Seedance 2.0 Fast: $0.091/s. Prices are at the pay-as-you-go rate. The quote before you generate is binding.
Seedance 2.0 Fast is the fastest here. Seedance 2.0 takes ~2–7 min. Seedance 2.0 Fast takes ~2–5 min.
Seedance 2.0 and Seedance 2.0 Fast take a still as the first frame or a reference.
Seedance 2.0 makes up to 15 seconds. Seedance 2.0 Fast makes up to 15 seconds.
Seedance 2.0 and Seedance 2.0 Fast render native audio with the picture.