AI video model comparison

Seedance 2.5 vs Wan 2.7 (image)

Wan 2.7 (image) is 27% cheaper (price per second at 720p: Seedance 2.5 $0.35/s vs Wan 2.7 (image) $0.25/s). Seedance 2.5 has longer clips, more reference images and native audio. Wan 2.7 (image) has the cheapest clip and faster renders.

Head to head

2 of 4 models · prices from the live catalog, Oct 23, 2026

Price
	Seedance 2.5ByteDanceflagshipTry it →	Wan 2.7 (image)AlibabaTry it →
Cheapest second	$0.16/s (best)	$0.25/s
Per second at 480p	$0.16/s	Not offered
Per second at 720p	$0.35/s	$0.25/s (best)
Per second at 1080p	$0.86/s	$0.38/s (best)
Cheapest clip	$0.64	$0.51 (best)
A 5-second clip at 720p	$1.75	$1.28 (best)
A 10-second clip at 1080p	$8.58	$3.83 (best)
Speed and length
Render time	~3–8 min	~1–2 min (best)
Longest clip	30s (best)	15s
Clip lengths	4–30s	2–15s
Output
Top resolution	1080p	1080P
Frames	9:16 · 16:9 · 1:1 · 4:3 · 3:4 · 21:9	Model default
Sound	Native (best)	—
Inputs
Takes	30Text · 30 images · 1 video · audio	2Text · 2 images · 1 video · audio
Reference images	Up to 30 (best)	Up to 2
Needs	A prompt	A start image
What it does
Can do	Text → videoImage → videoFirst + last frameMulti-referenceVideo → videoAudio-driven	Image → videoMulti-referenceVideo → videoAudio-driven
Good for	Cinematic scenes · Multi-reference · Product films	Value renders · Open ecosystem · Experimentation
Settings you control	Frame · Draft preview · Draft to finalize · Length · Mode · Audio · Attachment role · Per-attachment roles · Negative prompt · File format · Resolution · Return last frame · Seed · Watermark	Length · Negative prompt · Expand prompt · Resolution · Seed · Watermark

Same prompt, side by side

UGC selfie · the same prompt on every model

“A woman in her late twenties talks straight into her phone camera in a bright kitchen, handheld selfie framing, natural window light, she smiles and gestures mid-sentence, casual creator energy, no on-screen captions”

Same prompt

Seedance 2.5

Wan 2.7 (image): not rendered yet

Product shot · the same prompt on every model

“Cinematic product shot: a matte black wireless earbud case turns slowly on a dark reflective surface, a single warm rim light sweeps across it, macro lens, shallow depth of field, slow push-in, plain unbranded case”

Same prompt

Seedance 2.5

Wan 2.7 (image): not rendered yet

Which should you choose?

Choose Seedance 2.5 if you want

longer clips
more reference images
native audio
text → video, which the other cannot do
first + last frame, which the other cannot do
cinematic scenes
multi-reference

Generate with Seedance 2.5 →

Choose Wan 2.7 (image) if you want

a lower price per second at 720p
the cheapest clip
faster renders
value renders
open ecosystem

Generate with Wan 2.7 (image) →

More from each model

Seedance 2.5

0–2s: close-up of a barista's hands tamping espresso, warm tungsten light. 2–4s: milk pours into the cup, a rosetta forms in slow motion. 4–5s: she slides the cup across the bar toward camera and smiles, shallow depth of field

Wide shot of a mountain lake at dawn, mist lifting off the water, a loon calls and the sound echoes, a fish breaks the surface with a soft splash, slow push-in, natural ambience on frame

0–2s: a skateboarder drops into an empty concrete bowl at golden hour, low handheld follow. 2–4s: the camera swings around as she carves the wall, sparks of dust in backlight. 4–6s: she pops out and lands a clean stop, dust settling, one continuous shot, no cuts

Compare with others

Seedance 2.5 vs …

Wan 2.7 (image) vs …

← All video models, compared

How we compare

Prices come from the live catalog at the pay-as-you-go rate. The quote before you generate is binding. Plans and packs
Render times are the catalog’s own estimate for one render.
Every clip and image on this page was rendered on OpenClips.

Questions