AI video model comparison
Wan 2.7 (image) vs Wan 3.0 Prime
Wan 2.7 (image) is 29% cheaper (price per second at 720p: Wan 2.7 (image) $0.25/s vs Wan 3.0 Prime $0.36/s). Wan 2.7 (image) has faster renders. Wan 3.0 Prime has the cheapest clip, longer clips, more reference images and native audio.
| Price | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cheapest second | $0.25/s | $0.17/s (best) |
| Per second at 480p | Not offered | $0.17/s |
| Per second at 720p | $0.25/s (best) | $0.36/s |
| Per second at 1080p | $0.38/s (best) | $0.71/s |
| Cheapest clip | $0.51 | $0.35 (best) |
| A 5-second clip at 720p | $1.28 (best) | $1.79 |
| A 10-second clip at 1080p | $3.83 (best) | $7.14 |
| Speed and length | ||
| Render time | ~1–2 min (best) | ~1–3 min |
| Longest clip | 15s | 30s (best) |
| Clip lengths | 2–15s | 2–30s |
| Output | ||
| Top resolution | 1080P | 1080P |
| Frames | Model default | 16:9 · 4:3 · 1:1 · 3:4 · 9:16 |
| Sound | — | Native (best) |
| Inputs | ||
| Takes | 2Text · 2 images · 1 video · audio | 10Text · 10 images · 1 video · audio |
| Reference images | Up to 2 | Up to 10 (best) |
| Needs | A start image | A prompt |
| What it does | ||
| Can do | Image → videoMulti-referenceVideo → videoAudio-driven | Text → videoImage → videoFirst + last frameMulti-referenceVideo → videoAudio-driven |
| Good for | Value renders · Open ecosystem · Experimentation | Value renders · Open ecosystem · Experimentation |
| Settings you control | Length · Negative prompt · Expand prompt · Resolution · Seed · Watermark | Frame · Audio · Length · Document · Attachment role · Per-attachment roles · Web page · Expand prompt · Resolution · Seed · Watermark |
Same prompt, side by side
None of these models has a render on OpenClips yet.
Which should you choose?
Choose Wan 2.7 (image) if you want
- a lower price per second at 720p
- faster renders
- value renders
- open ecosystem
Choose Wan 3.0 Prime if you want
- the cheapest clip
- longer clips
- more reference images
- native audio
- text → video, which the other cannot do
- first + last frame, which the other cannot do
- value renders
- open ecosystem
Compare with others
Wan 2.7 (image) vs …
Wan 2.7 (image) vs Seedance 2.5
Wan 2.7 (image) vs MiniMax H3
Wan 2.7 (image) vs Pruna P-Video 2 Pro Reference
Wan 2.7 (image) vs Wan 3.0
Wan 2.7 (image) vs MiniMax H3 Max (reference)
Wan 2.7 (image) vs Seedance 2.0
Wan 3.0 Prime vs Seedance 2.0 Fast
Wan 3.0 Prime vs Kling O1How we compare
- Prices come from the live catalog at the pay-as-you-go rate. The quote before you generate is binding. Plans and packs
- Render times are the catalog’s own estimate for one render.
- Every clip and image on this page was rendered on OpenClips.
Questions
Wan 2.7 (image) vs Wan 3.0 Prime: questions
Wan 2.7 (image) costs the least here (price per second at 720p). Wan 2.7 (image): $0.25/s. Wan 3.0 Prime: $0.36/s. Prices are at the pay-as-you-go rate. The quote before you generate is binding.
Wan 2.7 (image) is the fastest here. Wan 2.7 (image) takes ~1–2 min. Wan 3.0 Prime takes ~1–3 min.
Wan 2.7 (image) and Wan 3.0 Prime take a still as the first frame or a reference.
Wan 2.7 (image) makes up to 15 seconds. Wan 3.0 Prime makes up to 30 seconds.
Wan 3.0 Prime renders native audio with the picture. Wan 2.7 (image): silent.