Sign up and save up to 25% on a yearly plan.Sign up free →
Pricing, save up to 25% on yearly plans
Pricing, save up to 25% on yearly plans

AI video model comparison

Kling O1 vs Wan 3.0

Kling O1 is 50% cheaper (price per second at 720p: Kling O1 $0.13/s vs Wan 3.0 $0.25/s). Kling O1 has faster renders. Wan 3.0 has the cheapest clip, longer clips, more reference images and native audio.

Head to head

2 of 4 models · prices from the live catalog,

Kling O1KuaishouTry it →
Wan 3.0AlibabaflagshipTry it →
Price
Cheapest second$0.13/s (best)$0.13/s
Per second at 480pNot offered$0.13/s
Per second at 720p$0.13/s (best)$0.25/s
Per second at 1080p$0.17/s (best)$0.51/s
Cheapest clip$0.39$0.26 (best)
A 5-second clip at 720p$0.64 (best)$1.28
A 10-second clip at 1080p$1.70 (best)$5.10
Speed and length
Render time~2 min (best)~2–7 min
Longest clip10s30s (best)
Clip lengths3–10s2–30s
Output
Top resolution1080p1080P
Frames16:9 · 9:16 · 1:116:9 · 4:3 · 1:1 · 3:4 · 9:16
SoundSource trackNative (best)
Inputs
Takes7Text · 7 images · 1 video10Text · 10 images · 1 video · audio
Reference imagesUp to 7Up to 10 (best)
NeedsA promptA prompt
What it does
Can doText → videoImage → videoFirst + last frameMulti-referenceVideo → videoText → videoImage → videoFirst + last frameMulti-referenceVideo → videoAudio-driven
Good forImage-to-video · Motion control · UGC contentValue renders · Open ecosystem · Experimentation
Settings you controlFrame · Audio · Length · Attachment role · Resolution · Clip roleFrame · Audio · Length · Document · Attachment role · Per-attachment roles · Web page · Expand prompt · Resolution · Seed · Watermark

Same prompt, side by side

UGC selfie · the same prompt on every model

“A woman in her late twenties talks straight into her phone camera in a bright kitchen, handheld selfie framing, natural window light, she smiles and gestures mid-sentence, casual creator energy, no on-screen captions”
Same prompt
Kling O1

Wan 3.0: not rendered yet

Product shot · the same prompt on every model

“Cinematic product shot: a matte black wireless earbud case turns slowly on a dark reflective surface, a single warm rim light sweeps across it, macro lens, shallow depth of field, slow push-in, plain unbranded case”
Same prompt
Kling O1

Wan 3.0: not rendered yet

Which should you choose?

Choose Kling O1 if you want

  • a lower price per second at 720p
  • faster renders
  • image-to-video
  • motion control
Generate with Kling O1 →

Choose Wan 3.0 if you want

  • the cheapest clip
  • longer clips
  • more reference images
  • native audio
  • audio-driven, which the other cannot do
  • value renders
  • open ecosystem
Generate with Wan 3.0 →

More from each model

Kling O1

A dancer spins in a mirrored studio, her skirt flares and the reflections track every turn, soft daylight, slow dolly in
A cyclist descends a mountain switchback, the camera follows from behind and leans into each turn with him, pine forest and morning haze
A street market at noon, a vendor hands fruit to a customer while a cyclist passes in the foreground and a dog trots across frame, static wide

Compare with others

Kling O1 vs …

Wan 3.0 vs …

← All video models, compared

How we compare

  • Prices come from the live catalog at the pay-as-you-go rate. The quote before you generate is binding. Plans and packs
  • Render times are the catalog’s own estimate for one render.
  • Every clip and image on this page was rendered on OpenClips.

Questions

Kling O1 vs Wan 3.0: questions

Kling O1 costs the least here (price per second at 720p). Kling O1: $0.13/s. Wan 3.0: $0.25/s. Prices are at the pay-as-you-go rate. The quote before you generate is binding.

Kling O1 is the fastest here. Kling O1 takes ~2 min. Wan 3.0 takes ~2–7 min.

Kling O1 and Wan 3.0 take a still as the first frame or a reference.

Kling O1 makes up to 10 seconds. Wan 3.0 makes up to 30 seconds.

Wan 3.0 renders native audio with the picture. Kling O1: carries a source clip's track.