AI video model comparison
Seedance 2.0 Fast vs Wan 3.0
Seedance 2.0 Fast is 64% cheaper (price per second at 720p: Seedance 2.0 Fast $0.091/s vs Wan 3.0 $0.25/s). Seedance 2.0 Fast has the cheapest clip and faster renders. Wan 3.0 has longer clips, a higher top resolution and more reference images.
| Price | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cheapest second | $0.041/s (best) | $0.13/s |
| Per second at 480p | $0.041/s (best) | $0.13/s |
| Per second at 720p | $0.091/s (best) | $0.25/s |
| Per second at 1080p | Not offered | $0.51/s |
| Cheapest clip | $0.18 (best) | $0.26 |
| A 5-second clip at 720p | $0.46 (best) | $1.28 |
| A 10-second clip at 1080p | Not offered | $5.10 |
| Speed and length | ||
| Render time | ~2–5 min (best) | ~2–7 min |
| Longest clip | 15s | 30s (best) |
| Clip lengths | 4–15s | 2–30s |
| Output | ||
| Top resolution | 720p | 1080P (best) |
| Frames | 9:16 · 16:9 · 1:1 · 4:3 · 3:4 · 21:9 | 16:9 · 4:3 · 1:1 · 3:4 · 9:16 |
| Sound | Native | Native |
| Inputs | ||
| Takes | 9Text · 9 images · 1 video · audio | 10Text · 10 images · 1 video · audio |
| Reference images | Up to 9 | Up to 10 (best) |
| Needs | A prompt | A prompt |
| What it does | ||
| Can do | Text → videoImage → videoFirst + last frameMulti-referenceVideo → videoAudio-driven | Text → videoImage → videoFirst + last frameMulti-referenceVideo → videoAudio-driven |
| Good for | Cinematic scenes · Multi-reference · Product films | Value renders · Open ecosystem · Experimentation |
| Settings you control | Frame · Length · Mode · Audio · Attachment role · Per-attachment roles · Negative prompt · Resolution · Return last frame · Seed · Watermark | Frame · Audio · Length · Document · Attachment role · Per-attachment roles · Web page · Expand prompt · Resolution · Seed · Watermark |
Same prompt, side by side
None of these models has a render on OpenClips yet.
Which should you choose?
Choose Seedance 2.0 Fast if you want
- a lower price per second at 720p
- the cheapest clip
- faster renders
- cinematic scenes
- multi-reference
Choose Wan 3.0 if you want
- longer clips
- a higher top resolution
- more reference images
- value renders
- open ecosystem
Compare with others
Seedance 2.0 Fast vs …
Seedance 2.0 Fast vs Seedance 2.0 Mini
Seedance 2.0 Fast vs Seedance 2.5
Seedance 2.0 Fast vs Seedance 2.0
Seedance 2.0 Fast vs Wan 3.0 Prime
Seedance 2.0 Fast vs MiniMax H3
Seedance 2.0 Fast vs Kling O1How we compare
- Prices come from the live catalog at the pay-as-you-go rate. The quote before you generate is binding. Plans and packs
- Render times are the catalog’s own estimate for one render.
- Every clip and image on this page was rendered on OpenClips.
Questions
Seedance 2.0 Fast vs Wan 3.0: questions
Seedance 2.0 Fast costs the least here (price per second at 720p). Seedance 2.0 Fast: $0.091/s. Wan 3.0: $0.25/s. Prices are at the pay-as-you-go rate. The quote before you generate is binding.
Seedance 2.0 Fast is the fastest here. Seedance 2.0 Fast takes ~2–5 min. Wan 3.0 takes ~2–7 min.
Seedance 2.0 Fast and Wan 3.0 take a still as the first frame or a reference.
Seedance 2.0 Fast makes up to 15 seconds. Wan 3.0 makes up to 30 seconds.
Seedance 2.0 Fast and Wan 3.0 render native audio with the picture.