AI video model comparison
Kling O1 vs Seedance 2.0
Kling O1 is 44% cheaper (price per second at 720p: Kling O1 $0.13/s vs Seedance 2.0 $0.23/s). Kling O1 has the cheapest clip and faster renders. Seedance 2.0 has longer clips, a higher top resolution, more reference images and native audio.
| Price | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cheapest second | $0.13/s | $0.10/s (best) |
| Per second at 480p | Not offered | $0.10/s |
| Per second at 720p | $0.13/s (best) | $0.23/s |
| Per second at 1080p | $0.17/s (best) | $0.56/s |
| Per second at 4K | Not offered | $1.17/s |
| Cheapest clip | $0.39 (best) | $0.41 |
| A 5-second clip at 720p | $0.64 (best) | $1.15 |
| A 10-second clip at 1080p | $1.70 (best) | $5.65 |
| Speed and length | ||
| Render time | ~2 min (best) | ~2–7 min |
| Longest clip | 10s | 15s (best) |
| Clip lengths | 3–10s | 4–15s |
| Output | ||
| Top resolution | 1080p | 4K (best) |
| Frames | 16:9 · 9:16 · 1:1 | 9:16 · 16:9 · 1:1 · 4:3 · 3:4 · 21:9 |
| Sound | Source track | Native (best) |
| Inputs | ||
| Takes | 7Text · 7 images · 1 video | 9Text · 9 images · 1 video · audio |
| Reference images | Up to 7 | Up to 9 (best) |
| Needs | A prompt | A prompt |
| What it does | ||
| Can do | Text → videoImage → videoFirst + last frameMulti-referenceVideo → video | Text → videoImage → videoFirst + last frameMulti-referenceVideo → videoAudio-driven |
| Good for | Image-to-video · Motion control · UGC content | Cinematic scenes · Multi-reference · Product films |
| Settings you control | Frame · Audio · Length · Attachment role · Resolution · Clip role | Frame · Length · Mode · Audio · Attachment role · Per-attachment roles · Negative prompt · Resolution · Return last frame · Seed · Watermark |
Same prompt, side by side
UGC selfie · the same prompt on every model
“A woman in her late twenties talks straight into her phone camera in a bright kitchen, handheld selfie framing, natural window light, she smiles and gestures mid-sentence, casual creator energy, no on-screen captions”
Product shot · the same prompt on every model
“Cinematic product shot: a matte black wireless earbud case turns slowly on a dark reflective surface, a single warm rim light sweeps across it, macro lens, shallow depth of field, slow push-in, plain unbranded case”
Motion & action · same subject, own prompts
Which should you choose?
Choose Kling O1 if you want
- a lower price per second at 720p
- the cheapest clip
- faster renders
- image-to-video
- motion control
Choose Seedance 2.0 if you want
- longer clips
- a higher top resolution
- more reference images
- native audio
- audio-driven, which the other cannot do
- cinematic scenes
- multi-reference
More from each model
Kling O1
Seedance 2.0
Compare with others
Kling O1 vs …
How we compare
- Prices come from the live catalog at the pay-as-you-go rate. The quote before you generate is binding. Plans and packs
- Render times are the catalog’s own estimate for one render.
- Every clip and image on this page was rendered on OpenClips.
Questions
Kling O1 vs Seedance 2.0: questions
Kling O1 costs the least here (price per second at 720p). Kling O1: $0.13/s. Seedance 2.0: $0.23/s. Prices are at the pay-as-you-go rate. The quote before you generate is binding.
Kling O1 is the fastest here. Kling O1 takes ~2 min. Seedance 2.0 takes ~2–7 min.
Kling O1 and Seedance 2.0 take a still as the first frame or a reference.
Kling O1 makes up to 10 seconds. Seedance 2.0 makes up to 15 seconds.
Seedance 2.0 renders native audio with the picture. Kling O1: carries a source clip's track.