AI video model comparison
Runway Gen-4.5 vs Wan 3.0
Wan 3.0 is 58% cheaper (cheapest second: Runway Gen-4.5 $0.31/s vs Wan 3.0 $0.13/s). Runway Gen-4.5 has faster renders. Wan 3.0 has the cheapest clip, longer clips, more reference images and native audio.
| Price | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cheapest second | $0.31/s | $0.13/s (best) |
| Per second at 480p | Not offered | $0.13/s |
| Per second at 720p | Not offered | $0.25/s |
| Per second at 1080p | Not offered | $0.51/s |
| Cheapest clip | $0.61 | $0.26 (best) |
| A 5-second clip at 720p | Not offered | $1.28 |
| A 10-second clip at 1080p | Not offered | $5.10 |
| Speed and length | ||
| Render time | ~1–2 min (best) | ~2–7 min |
| Longest clip | 10s | 30s (best) |
| Clip lengths | 2–10s | 2–30s |
| Output | ||
| Top resolution | — | 1080P |
| Frames | 1280:720 · 720:1280 · 1584:672 · 1104:832 · 832:1104 · 960:960 | 16:9 · 4:3 · 1:1 · 3:4 · 9:16 |
| Sound | — | Native (best) |
| Inputs | ||
| Takes | 1Text · 1 image | 10Text · 10 images · 1 video · audio |
| Reference images | Up to 1 | Up to 10 (best) |
| Needs | A prompt | A prompt |
| What it does | ||
| Can do | Text → videoImage → video | Text → videoImage → videoFirst + last frameMulti-referenceVideo → videoAudio-driven |
| Good for | Studio workflows · VFX plates · Brand work | Value renders · Open ecosystem · Experimentation |
| Settings you control | Content moderation · Length · Frame · Seed | Frame · Audio · Length · Document · Attachment role · Per-attachment roles · Web page · Expand prompt · Resolution · Seed · Watermark |
Same prompt, side by side
No category has a render from two of these models yet. Each model’s own renders are further down.
Which should you choose?
Choose Runway Gen-4.5 if you want
- faster renders
- studio workflows
- VFX plates
Choose Wan 3.0 if you want
- a lower price per second
- the cheapest clip
- longer clips
- more reference images
- native audio
- first + last frame, which the other cannot do
- multi-reference, which the other cannot do
- video → video, which the other cannot do
- audio-driven, which the other cannot do
- value renders
- open ecosystem
More from each model
Runway Gen-4.5
Compare with others
Runway Gen-4.5 vs …
How we compare
- Prices come from the live catalog at the pay-as-you-go rate. The quote before you generate is binding. Plans and packs
- Render times are the catalog’s own estimate for one render.
- Every clip and image on this page was rendered on OpenClips.
Questions
Runway Gen-4.5 vs Wan 3.0: questions
Wan 3.0 costs the least here (cheapest second). Runway Gen-4.5: $0.31/s. Wan 3.0: $0.13/s. Prices are at the pay-as-you-go rate. The quote before you generate is binding.
Runway Gen-4.5 is the fastest here. Runway Gen-4.5 takes ~1–2 min. Wan 3.0 takes ~2–7 min.
Runway Gen-4.5 and Wan 3.0 take a still as the first frame or a reference.
Runway Gen-4.5 makes up to 10 seconds. Wan 3.0 makes up to 30 seconds.
Wan 3.0 renders native audio with the picture. Runway Gen-4.5: silent.