AI video model comparison
Kling 3.0 Turbo vs Kling O1
Kling O1 is 25% cheaper (price per second at 720p: Kling 3.0 Turbo $0.17/s vs Kling O1 $0.13/s). Kling 3.0 Turbo has faster renders, longer clips and native audio. Kling O1 has the cheapest clip and more reference images.
| Price | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cheapest second | $0.17/s | $0.13/s (best) |
| Per second at 720p | $0.17/s | $0.13/s (best) |
| Per second at 1080p | $0.21/s | $0.17/s (best) |
| Cheapest clip | $0.51 | $0.39 (best) |
| A 5-second clip at 720p | $0.85 | $0.64 (best) |
| A 10-second clip at 1080p | $2.11 | $1.70 (best) |
| Speed and length | ||
| Render time | ~1–2 min (best) | ~2 min |
| Longest clip | 15s (best) | 10s |
| Clip lengths | 3–15s | 3–10s |
| Output | ||
| Top resolution | 1080p | 1080p |
| Frames | 16:9 · 9:16 · 1:1 | 16:9 · 9:16 · 1:1 |
| Sound | Always on (best) | Source track |
| Inputs | ||
| Takes | 1Text · 1 image | 7Text · 7 images · 1 video |
| Reference images | Up to 1 | Up to 7 (best) |
| Needs | A prompt | A prompt |
| What it does | ||
| Can do | Text → videoImage → video | Text → videoImage → videoFirst + last frameMulti-referenceVideo → video |
| Good for | Image-to-video · Motion control · UGC content | Image-to-video · Motion control · UGC content |
| Settings you control | Frame · Length · Resolution | Frame · Audio · Length · Attachment role · Resolution · Clip role |
Same prompt, side by side
UGC selfie · the same prompt on every model
“A woman in her late twenties talks straight into her phone camera in a bright kitchen, handheld selfie framing, natural window light, she smiles and gestures mid-sentence, casual creator energy, no on-screen captions”
Product shot · the same prompt on every model
“Cinematic product shot: a matte black wireless earbud case turns slowly on a dark reflective surface, a single warm rim light sweeps across it, macro lens, shallow depth of field, slow push-in, plain unbranded case”
Which should you choose?
Choose Kling 3.0 Turbo if you want
- faster renders
- longer clips
- native audio
- image-to-video
- motion control
Choose Kling O1 if you want
- a lower price per second at 720p
- the cheapest clip
- more reference images
- first + last frame, which the other cannot do
- multi-reference, which the other cannot do
- video → video, which the other cannot do
- image-to-video
- motion control
More from each model
Kling O1
Compare with others
Kling 3.0 Turbo vs …
Kling 3.0 Turbo vs Seedance 2.5
Kling 3.0 Turbo vs Wan 3.0
Kling 3.0 Turbo vs Wan 3.0 Prime
Kling 3.0 Turbo vs Kling 3.0
Kling 3.0 Turbo vs Hailuo 2.3
Kling 3.0 Turbo vs Grok Imagine Video
Kling O1 vs Seedance 2.0
Kling O1 vs MiniMax H3
Kling O1 vs Seedance 2.0 FastHow we compare
- Prices come from the live catalog at the pay-as-you-go rate. The quote before you generate is binding. Plans and packs
- Render times are the catalog’s own estimate for one render.
- Every clip and image on this page was rendered on OpenClips.
Questions
Kling 3.0 Turbo vs Kling O1: questions
Kling O1 costs the least here (price per second at 720p). Kling 3.0 Turbo: $0.17/s. Kling O1: $0.13/s. Prices are at the pay-as-you-go rate. The quote before you generate is binding.
Kling 3.0 Turbo is the fastest here. Kling 3.0 Turbo takes ~1–2 min. Kling O1 takes ~2 min.
Kling 3.0 Turbo and Kling O1 take a still as the first frame or a reference.
Kling 3.0 Turbo makes up to 15 seconds. Kling O1 makes up to 10 seconds.
Kling 3.0 Turbo renders native audio with the picture. Kling O1: carries a source clip's track.