AI video model comparison
Kling 3.0 Turbo vs Wan 3.0
Kling 3.0 Turbo is 34% cheaper (price per second at 720p: Kling 3.0 Turbo $0.17/s vs Wan 3.0 $0.25/s). Kling 3.0 Turbo has faster renders. Wan 3.0 has the cheapest clip, longer clips and more reference images.
| Price | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cheapest second | $0.17/s | $0.13/s (best) |
| Per second at 480p | Not offered | $0.13/s |
| Per second at 720p | $0.17/s (best) | $0.25/s |
| Per second at 1080p | $0.21/s (best) | $0.51/s |
| Cheapest clip | $0.51 | $0.26 (best) |
| A 5-second clip at 720p | $0.85 (best) | $1.28 |
| A 10-second clip at 1080p | $2.11 (best) | $5.10 |
| Speed and length | ||
| Render time | ~1–2 min (best) | ~2–7 min |
| Longest clip | 15s | 30s (best) |
| Clip lengths | 3–15s | 2–30s |
| Output | ||
| Top resolution | 1080p | 1080P |
| Frames | 16:9 · 9:16 · 1:1 | 16:9 · 4:3 · 1:1 · 3:4 · 9:16 |
| Sound | Always on | Native |
| Inputs | ||
| Takes | 1Text · 1 image | 10Text · 10 images · 1 video · audio |
| Reference images | Up to 1 | Up to 10 (best) |
| Needs | A prompt | A prompt |
| What it does | ||
| Can do | Text → videoImage → video | Text → videoImage → videoFirst + last frameMulti-referenceVideo → videoAudio-driven |
| Good for | Image-to-video · Motion control · UGC content | Value renders · Open ecosystem · Experimentation |
| Settings you control | Frame · Length · Resolution | Frame · Audio · Length · Document · Attachment role · Per-attachment roles · Web page · Expand prompt · Resolution · Seed · Watermark |
Same prompt, side by side
None of these models has a render on OpenClips yet.
Which should you choose?
Choose Kling 3.0 Turbo if you want
- a lower price per second at 720p
- faster renders
- image-to-video
- motion control
Choose Wan 3.0 if you want
- the cheapest clip
- longer clips
- more reference images
- first + last frame, which the other cannot do
- multi-reference, which the other cannot do
- video → video, which the other cannot do
- audio-driven, which the other cannot do
- value renders
- open ecosystem
Compare with others
Kling 3.0 Turbo vs …
Kling 3.0 Turbo vs Seedance 2.5
Kling 3.0 Turbo vs Wan 3.0 Prime
Kling 3.0 Turbo vs Kling 3.0
Kling 3.0 Turbo vs Hailuo 2.3
Kling 3.0 Turbo vs Grok Imagine Video
Kling 3.0 Turbo vs Kling O1
Wan 3.0 vs Seedance 2.0
Wan 3.0 vs MiniMax H3
Wan 3.0 vs Seedance 2.0 FastHow we compare
- Prices come from the live catalog at the pay-as-you-go rate. The quote before you generate is binding. Plans and packs
- Render times are the catalog’s own estimate for one render.
- Every clip and image on this page was rendered on OpenClips.
Questions
Kling 3.0 Turbo vs Wan 3.0: questions
Kling 3.0 Turbo costs the least here (price per second at 720p). Kling 3.0 Turbo: $0.17/s. Wan 3.0: $0.25/s. Prices are at the pay-as-you-go rate. The quote before you generate is binding.
Kling 3.0 Turbo is the fastest here. Kling 3.0 Turbo takes ~1–2 min. Wan 3.0 takes ~2–7 min.
Kling 3.0 Turbo and Wan 3.0 take a still as the first frame or a reference.
Kling 3.0 Turbo makes up to 15 seconds. Wan 3.0 makes up to 30 seconds.
Kling 3.0 Turbo and Wan 3.0 render native audio with the picture.