AI video model comparison
Gemini Omni Flash 1.1 vs Wan 3.0
Gemini Omni Flash 1.1 is 39% cheaper (price per second at 720p: Gemini Omni Flash 1.1 $0.16/s vs Wan 3.0 $0.25/s). Gemini Omni Flash 1.1 has the cheapest clip, faster renders and a higher top resolution. Wan 3.0 has longer clips and more reference images.
| Price | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cheapest second | $0.053/s (best) | $0.13/s |
| Per second at 480p | $0.053/s (best) | $0.13/s |
| Per second at 720p | $0.16/s (best) | $0.25/s |
| Per second at 1080p | $0.23/s (best) | $0.51/s |
| Per second at 4K | $0.47/s | Not offered |
| Cheapest clip | $0.21 (best) | $0.26 |
| A 5-second clip at 720p | Not offered | $1.28 |
| A 10-second clip at 1080p | $2.35 (best) | $5.10 |
| Speed and length | ||
| Render time | ~1–2 min (best) | ~2–7 min |
| Longest clip | 10s | 30s (best) |
| Clip lengths | 4–10s | 2–30s |
| Output | ||
| Top resolution | 4k (best) | 1080P |
| Frames | 16:9 · 9:16 | 16:9 · 4:3 · 1:1 · 3:4 · 9:16 |
| Sound | Always on | Native |
| Inputs | ||
| Takes | 6Text · 6 images | 10Text · 10 images · 1 video · audio |
| Reference images | Up to 6 | Up to 10 (best) |
| Needs | A prompt | A prompt |
| What it does | ||
| Can do | Text → videoImage → videoFirst + last frameMulti-reference | Text → videoImage → videoFirst + last frameMulti-referenceVideo → videoAudio-driven |
| Good for | Any-to-any video · Native audio · Up to 6 references | Value renders · Open ecosystem · Experimentation |
| Settings you control | Frame · Length · Attachment role · Resolution · Mode | Frame · Audio · Length · Document · Attachment role · Per-attachment roles · Web page · Expand prompt · Resolution · Seed · Watermark |
Same prompt, side by side
UGC selfie · the same prompt on every model
“A woman in her late twenties talks straight into her phone camera in a bright kitchen, handheld selfie framing, natural window light, she smiles and gestures mid-sentence, casual creator energy, no on-screen captions”
Product shot · the same prompt on every model
“Cinematic product shot: a matte black wireless earbud case turns slowly on a dark reflective surface, a single warm rim light sweeps across it, macro lens, shallow depth of field, slow push-in, plain unbranded case”
Which should you choose?
Choose Gemini Omni Flash 1.1 if you want
- a lower price per second at 720p
- the cheapest clip
- faster renders
- a higher top resolution
- any-to-any video
- native audio
Choose Wan 3.0 if you want
- longer clips
- more reference images
- video → video, which the other cannot do
- audio-driven, which the other cannot do
- value renders
- open ecosystem
More from each model
Gemini Omni Flash 1.1
Compare with others
Gemini Omni Flash 1.1 vs …
Gemini Omni Flash 1.1 vs Veo 3.1
Gemini Omni Flash 1.1 vs Seedance 2.0 Fast
Gemini Omni Flash 1.1 vs Seedance 2.5
Gemini Omni Flash 1.1 vs Seedance 2.0
Gemini Omni Flash 1.1 vs Seedance 2.0 Mini
Gemini Omni Flash 1.1 vs Kling O1
Wan 3.0 vs Wan 3.0 Prime
Wan 3.0 vs MiniMax H3How we compare
- Prices come from the live catalog at the pay-as-you-go rate. The quote before you generate is binding. Plans and packs
- Render times are the catalog’s own estimate for one render.
- Every clip and image on this page was rendered on OpenClips.
Questions
Gemini Omni Flash 1.1 vs Wan 3.0: questions
Gemini Omni Flash 1.1 costs the least here (price per second at 720p). Gemini Omni Flash 1.1: $0.16/s. Wan 3.0: $0.25/s. Prices are at the pay-as-you-go rate. The quote before you generate is binding.
Gemini Omni Flash 1.1 is the fastest here. Gemini Omni Flash 1.1 takes ~1–2 min. Wan 3.0 takes ~2–7 min.
Gemini Omni Flash 1.1 and Wan 3.0 take a still as the first frame or a reference.
Gemini Omni Flash 1.1 makes up to 10 seconds. Wan 3.0 makes up to 30 seconds.
Gemini Omni Flash 1.1 and Wan 3.0 render native audio with the picture.