AI video model comparison
OmniHuman 2.0 vs Wan 2.7 (image)
OmniHuman 2.0 is 30% cheaper (cheapest second: OmniHuman 2.0 $0.18/s vs Wan 2.7 (image) $0.25/s). OmniHuman 2.0 has longer clips and native audio. Wan 2.7 (image) has the cheapest clip, faster renders and more reference images.
| Price | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cheapest second | $0.18/s (best) | $0.25/s |
| Per second at 720p | Not offered | $0.25/s |
| Per second at 1080p | Not offered | $0.38/s |
| Cheapest clip | $0.73 | $0.51 (best) |
| A 5-second clip at 720p | Not offered | $1.28 |
| A 10-second clip at 1080p | Not offered | $3.83 |
| Speed and length | ||
| Render time | ~2–10 min | ~1–2 min (best) |
| Longest clip | 120s (best) | 15s |
| Clip lengths | 4–120s | 2–15s |
| Output | ||
| Top resolution | — | 1080P |
| Frames | Model default | Model default |
| Sound | Always on (best) | — |
| Inputs | ||
| Takes | 1Text · 1 image · audio | 2Text · 2 images · 1 video · audio |
| Reference images | Up to 1 | Up to 2 (best) |
| Needs | A start image | A start image |
| What it does | ||
| Can do | Image → videoAudio-driven | Image → videoMulti-referenceVideo → videoAudio-driven |
| Good for | — | Value renders · Open ecosystem · Experimentation |
| Settings you control | Length | Length · Negative prompt · Expand prompt · Resolution · Seed · Watermark |
Same prompt, side by side
None of these models has a render on OpenClips yet.
Which should you choose?
Choose OmniHuman 2.0 if you want
- a lower price per second
- longer clips
- native audio
Choose Wan 2.7 (image) if you want
- the cheapest clip
- faster renders
- more reference images
- multi-reference, which the other cannot do
- video → video, which the other cannot do
- value renders
- open ecosystem
Compare with others
OmniHuman 2.0 vs …
OmniHuman 2.0 vs Seedance 2.5
OmniHuman 2.0 vs Wan 3.0
OmniHuman 2.0 vs Wan 3.0 Prime
OmniHuman 2.0 vs Pruna P-Video 2 Pro Reference
OmniHuman 2.0 vs MiniMax H3
Wan 2.7 (image) vs MiniMax H3 Max (reference)How we compare
- Prices come from the live catalog at the pay-as-you-go rate. The quote before you generate is binding. Plans and packs
- Render times are the catalog’s own estimate for one render.
- Every clip and image on this page was rendered on OpenClips.
Questions
OmniHuman 2.0 vs Wan 2.7 (image): questions
OmniHuman 2.0 costs the least here (cheapest second). OmniHuman 2.0: $0.18/s. Wan 2.7 (image): $0.25/s. Prices are at the pay-as-you-go rate. The quote before you generate is binding.
Wan 2.7 (image) is the fastest here. OmniHuman 2.0 takes ~2–10 min. Wan 2.7 (image) takes ~1–2 min.
OmniHuman 2.0 and Wan 2.7 (image) take a still as the first frame or a reference.
OmniHuman 2.0 makes up to 120 seconds. Wan 2.7 (image) makes up to 15 seconds.
OmniHuman 2.0 renders native audio with the picture. Wan 2.7 (image): silent.