AI video model comparison
OmniHuman 2.0 vs Wan 3.0
Wan 3.0 is 29% cheaper (cheapest second: OmniHuman 2.0 $0.18/s vs Wan 3.0 $0.13/s). OmniHuman 2.0 has longer clips. Wan 3.0 has the cheapest clip, faster renders and more reference images.
| Price | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cheapest second | $0.18/s | $0.13/s (best) |
| Per second at 480p | Not offered | $0.13/s |
| Per second at 720p | Not offered | $0.25/s |
| Per second at 1080p | Not offered | $0.51/s |
| Cheapest clip | $0.73 | $0.26 (best) |
| A 5-second clip at 720p | Not offered | $1.28 |
| A 10-second clip at 1080p | Not offered | $5.10 |
| Speed and length | ||
| Render time | ~2–10 min | ~2–7 min (best) |
| Longest clip | 120s (best) | 30s |
| Clip lengths | 4–120s | 2–30s |
| Output | ||
| Top resolution | — | 1080P |
| Frames | Model default | 16:9 · 4:3 · 1:1 · 3:4 · 9:16 |
| Sound | Always on | Native |
| Inputs | ||
| Takes | 1Text · 1 image · audio | 10Text · 10 images · 1 video · audio |
| Reference images | Up to 1 | Up to 10 (best) |
| Needs | A start image | A prompt |
| What it does | ||
| Can do | Image → videoAudio-driven | Text → videoImage → videoFirst + last frameMulti-referenceVideo → videoAudio-driven |
| Good for | — | Value renders · Open ecosystem · Experimentation |
| Settings you control | Length | Frame · Audio · Length · Document · Attachment role · Per-attachment roles · Web page · Expand prompt · Resolution · Seed · Watermark |
Same prompt, side by side
None of these models has a render on OpenClips yet.
Which should you choose?
Choose Wan 3.0 if you want
- a lower price per second
- the cheapest clip
- faster renders
- more reference images
- text → video, which the other cannot do
- first + last frame, which the other cannot do
- multi-reference, which the other cannot do
- video → video, which the other cannot do
- value renders
- open ecosystem
Compare with others
OmniHuman 2.0 vs …
OmniHuman 2.0 vs Seedance 2.5
OmniHuman 2.0 vs Wan 3.0 Prime
OmniHuman 2.0 vs Pruna P-Video 2 Pro Reference
OmniHuman 2.0 vs Wan 2.7 (image)
OmniHuman 2.0 vs MiniMax H3
Wan 3.0 vs Seedance 2.0
Wan 3.0 vs Seedance 2.0 Fast
Wan 3.0 vs Kling O1How we compare
- Prices come from the live catalog at the pay-as-you-go rate. The quote before you generate is binding. Plans and packs
- Render times are the catalog’s own estimate for one render.
- Every clip and image on this page was rendered on OpenClips.
Questions
OmniHuman 2.0 vs Wan 3.0: questions
Wan 3.0 costs the least here (cheapest second). OmniHuman 2.0: $0.18/s. Wan 3.0: $0.13/s. Prices are at the pay-as-you-go rate. The quote before you generate is binding.
Wan 3.0 is the fastest here. OmniHuman 2.0 takes ~2–10 min. Wan 3.0 takes ~2–7 min.
OmniHuman 2.0 and Wan 3.0 take a still as the first frame or a reference.
OmniHuman 2.0 makes up to 120 seconds. Wan 3.0 makes up to 30 seconds.
OmniHuman 2.0 and Wan 3.0 render native audio with the picture.