AI video model comparison
Grok Imagine Video vs Seedance 2.0
Grok Imagine Video is 22% cheaper (price per second at 720p: Grok Imagine Video $0.18/s vs Seedance 2.0 $0.23/s). Grok Imagine Video has the cheapest clip and faster renders. Seedance 2.0 has a higher top resolution, more reference images and native audio.
| Price | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cheapest second | $0.13/s | $0.10/s (best) |
| Per second at 480p | $0.13/s | $0.10/s (best) |
| Per second at 720p | $0.18/s (best) | $0.23/s |
| Per second at 1080p | Not offered | $0.56/s |
| Per second at 4K | Not offered | $1.17/s |
| Cheapest clip | $0.14 (best) | $0.41 |
| A 5-second clip at 720p | $0.90 (best) | $1.15 |
| A 10-second clip at 1080p | Not offered | $5.65 |
| Speed and length | ||
| Render time | ~1–2 min (best) | ~2–7 min |
| Longest clip | 15s | 15s |
| Clip lengths | 1–15s | 4–15s |
| Output | ||
| Top resolution | 720p | 4K (best) |
| Frames | 1:1 · 16:9 · 9:16 · 4:3 · 3:4 · 3:2 · 2:3 | 9:16 · 16:9 · 1:1 · 4:3 · 3:4 · 21:9 |
| Sound | — | Native (best) |
| Inputs | ||
| Takes | 8Text · 8 images | 9Text · 9 images · 1 video · audio |
| Reference images | Up to 8 | Up to 9 (best) |
| Needs | A prompt | A prompt |
| What it does | ||
| Can do | Text → videoImage → videoMulti-reference | Text → videoImage → videoFirst + last frameMulti-referenceVideo → videoAudio-driven |
| Good for | Fast drafts · Edgy creative · Memes | Cinematic scenes · Multi-reference · Product films |
| Settings you control | Frame · Length · Resolution | Frame · Length · Mode · Audio · Attachment role · Per-attachment roles · Negative prompt · Resolution · Return last frame · Seed · Watermark |
Same prompt, side by side
UGC selfie · the same prompt on every model
“A woman in her late twenties talks straight into her phone camera in a bright kitchen, handheld selfie framing, natural window light, she smiles and gestures mid-sentence, casual creator energy, no on-screen captions”
Product shot · the same prompt on every model
“Cinematic product shot: a matte black wireless earbud case turns slowly on a dark reflective surface, a single warm rim light sweeps across it, macro lens, shallow depth of field, slow push-in, plain unbranded case”
Which should you choose?
Choose Grok Imagine Video if you want
- a lower price per second at 720p
- the cheapest clip
- faster renders
- fast drafts
- edgy creative
Choose Seedance 2.0 if you want
- a higher top resolution
- more reference images
- native audio
- first + last frame, which the other cannot do
- video → video, which the other cannot do
- audio-driven, which the other cannot do
- cinematic scenes
- multi-reference
More from each model
Seedance 2.0
Compare with others
Grok Imagine Video vs …
Grok Imagine Video vs Wan 3.0
Grok Imagine Video vs Seedance 2.5
Grok Imagine Video vs Kling O1
Grok Imagine Video vs Wan 3.0 Prime
Grok Imagine Video vs Gemini Omni Flash 1.1
Grok Imagine Video vs MiniMax H3
Seedance 2.0 vs Kling 3.0
Seedance 2.0 vs Veo 3.1
Seedance 2.0 vs Seedance 2.0 FastHow we compare
- Prices come from the live catalog at the pay-as-you-go rate. The quote before you generate is binding. Plans and packs
- Render times are the catalog’s own estimate for one render.
- Every clip and image on this page was rendered on OpenClips.
Questions
Grok Imagine Video vs Seedance 2.0: questions
Grok Imagine Video costs the least here (price per second at 720p). Grok Imagine Video: $0.18/s. Seedance 2.0: $0.23/s. Prices are at the pay-as-you-go rate. The quote before you generate is binding.
Grok Imagine Video is the fastest here. Grok Imagine Video takes ~1–2 min. Seedance 2.0 takes ~2–7 min.
Grok Imagine Video and Seedance 2.0 take a still as the first frame or a reference.
Grok Imagine Video makes up to 15 seconds. Seedance 2.0 makes up to 15 seconds.
Seedance 2.0 renders native audio with the picture. Grok Imagine Video: silent.