AI video model comparison
Grok Imagine Video vs Wan 3.0
Grok Imagine Video is 30% cheaper (price per second at 720p: Grok Imagine Video $0.18/s vs Wan 3.0 $0.25/s). Grok Imagine Video has the cheapest clip and faster renders. Wan 3.0 has longer clips, a higher top resolution, more reference images and native audio.
| Price | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cheapest second | $0.13/s | $0.13/s (best) |
| Per second at 480p | $0.13/s | $0.13/s (best) |
| Per second at 720p | $0.18/s (best) | $0.25/s |
| Per second at 1080p | Not offered | $0.51/s |
| Cheapest clip | $0.14 (best) | $0.26 |
| A 5-second clip at 720p | $0.90 (best) | $1.28 |
| A 10-second clip at 1080p | Not offered | $5.10 |
| Speed and length | ||
| Render time | ~1–2 min (best) | ~2–7 min |
| Longest clip | 15s | 30s (best) |
| Clip lengths | 1–15s | 2–30s |
| Output | ||
| Top resolution | 720p | 1080P (best) |
| Frames | 1:1 · 16:9 · 9:16 · 4:3 · 3:4 · 3:2 · 2:3 | 16:9 · 4:3 · 1:1 · 3:4 · 9:16 |
| Sound | — | Native (best) |
| Inputs | ||
| Takes | 8Text · 8 images | 10Text · 10 images · 1 video · audio |
| Reference images | Up to 8 | Up to 10 (best) |
| Needs | A prompt | A prompt |
| What it does | ||
| Can do | Text → videoImage → videoMulti-reference | Text → videoImage → videoFirst + last frameMulti-referenceVideo → videoAudio-driven |
| Good for | Fast drafts · Edgy creative · Memes | Value renders · Open ecosystem · Experimentation |
| Settings you control | Frame · Length · Resolution | Frame · Audio · Length · Document · Attachment role · Per-attachment roles · Web page · Expand prompt · Resolution · Seed · Watermark |
Same prompt, side by side
None of these models has a render on OpenClips yet.
Which should you choose?
Choose Grok Imagine Video if you want
- a lower price per second at 720p
- the cheapest clip
- faster renders
- fast drafts
- edgy creative
Choose Wan 3.0 if you want
- longer clips
- a higher top resolution
- more reference images
- native audio
- first + last frame, which the other cannot do
- video → video, which the other cannot do
- audio-driven, which the other cannot do
- value renders
- open ecosystem
Compare with others
Grok Imagine Video vs …
Grok Imagine Video vs Seedance 2.5
Grok Imagine Video vs Kling O1
Grok Imagine Video vs Seedance 2.0
Grok Imagine Video vs Wan 3.0 Prime
Grok Imagine Video vs Gemini Omni Flash 1.1
Grok Imagine Video vs MiniMax H3
Wan 3.0 vs Seedance 2.0 FastHow we compare
- Prices come from the live catalog at the pay-as-you-go rate. The quote before you generate is binding. Plans and packs
- Render times are the catalog’s own estimate for one render.
- Every clip and image on this page was rendered on OpenClips.
Questions
Grok Imagine Video vs Wan 3.0: questions
Grok Imagine Video costs the least here (price per second at 720p). Grok Imagine Video: $0.18/s. Wan 3.0: $0.25/s. Prices are at the pay-as-you-go rate. The quote before you generate is binding.
Grok Imagine Video is the fastest here. Grok Imagine Video takes ~1–2 min. Wan 3.0 takes ~2–7 min.
Grok Imagine Video and Wan 3.0 take a still as the first frame or a reference.
Grok Imagine Video makes up to 15 seconds. Wan 3.0 makes up to 30 seconds.
Wan 3.0 renders native audio with the picture. Grok Imagine Video: silent.