AI video model comparison
Seedance 2.0 vs Vidu Q4 (reference)
Seedance 2.0 is 6% cheaper (price per second at 720p: Seedance 2.0 $0.23/s vs Vidu Q4 (reference) $0.24/s). Vidu Q4 (reference) has the cheapest clip, faster renders, longer clips and more reference images.
| Price | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cheapest second | $0.10/s (best) | $0.11/s |
| Per second at 480p | $0.10/s (best) | $0.11/s |
| Per second at 720p | $0.23/s (best) | $0.24/s |
| Per second at 1080p | $0.56/s | $0.31/s (best) |
| Per second at 2K | Not offered | $0.48/s |
| Per second at 4K | $1.17/s | $0.99/s (best) |
| Cheapest clip | $0.41 | $0.35 (best) |
| A 5-second clip at 720p | $1.15 (best) | $1.21 |
| A 10-second clip at 1080p | $5.65 | $3.06 (best) |
| Speed and length | ||
| Render time | ~2–7 min | ~2 min (best) |
| Longest clip | 15s | 16s (best) |
| Clip lengths | 4–15s | 3–16s |
| Output | ||
| Top resolution | 4K | 4K |
| Frames | 9:16 · 16:9 · 1:1 · 4:3 · 3:4 · 21:9 | 16:9 · 9:16 · 4:3 · 3:4 · 1:1 |
| Sound | Native | Native |
| Inputs | ||
| Takes | 9Text · 9 images · 1 video · audio | 12Text · 12 images · audio |
| Reference images | Up to 9 | Up to 12 (best) |
| Needs | A prompt | A start image |
| What it does | ||
| Can do | Text → videoImage → videoFirst + last frameMulti-referenceVideo → videoAudio-driven | Image → videoMulti-referenceAudio-driven |
| Good for | Cinematic scenes · Multi-reference · Product films | — |
| Settings you control | Frame · Length · Mode · Audio · Attachment role · Per-attachment roles · Negative prompt · Resolution · Return last frame · Seed · Watermark | Frame · Audio · Length · Resolution · Seed |
Same prompt, side by side
UGC selfie · the same prompt on every model
“A woman in her late twenties talks straight into her phone camera in a bright kitchen, handheld selfie framing, natural window light, she smiles and gestures mid-sentence, casual creator energy, no on-screen captions”
Product shot · the same prompt on every model
“Cinematic product shot: a matte black wireless earbud case turns slowly on a dark reflective surface, a single warm rim light sweeps across it, macro lens, shallow depth of field, slow push-in, plain unbranded case”
Which should you choose?
Choose Seedance 2.0 if you want
- a lower price per second at 720p
- text → video, which the other cannot do
- first + last frame, which the other cannot do
- video → video, which the other cannot do
- cinematic scenes
- multi-reference
Choose Vidu Q4 (reference) if you want
- the cheapest clip
- faster renders
- longer clips
- more reference images
More from each model
Seedance 2.0
Compare with others
Seedance 2.0 vs …
Seedance 2.0 vs Seedance 2.5
Seedance 2.0 vs Kling 3.0
Seedance 2.0 vs Veo 3.1
Seedance 2.0 vs Wan 3.0
Seedance 2.0 vs Wan 3.0 Prime
Seedance 2.0 vs Seedance 2.0 Fast
Vidu Q4 (reference) vs Pruna P-Video 2 Pro Reference
Vidu Q4 (reference) vs Wan 2.7 (image)
Vidu Q4 (reference) vs MiniMax H3How we compare
- Prices come from the live catalog at the pay-as-you-go rate. The quote before you generate is binding. Plans and packs
- Render times are the catalog’s own estimate for one render.
- Every clip and image on this page was rendered on OpenClips.
Questions
Seedance 2.0 vs Vidu Q4 (reference): questions
Seedance 2.0 costs the least here (price per second at 720p). Seedance 2.0: $0.23/s. Vidu Q4 (reference): $0.24/s. Prices are at the pay-as-you-go rate. The quote before you generate is binding.
Vidu Q4 (reference) is the fastest here. Seedance 2.0 takes ~2–7 min. Vidu Q4 (reference) takes ~2 min.
Seedance 2.0 and Vidu Q4 (reference) take a still as the first frame or a reference.
Seedance 2.0 makes up to 15 seconds. Vidu Q4 (reference) makes up to 16 seconds.
Seedance 2.0 and Vidu Q4 (reference) render native audio with the picture.