AI video model comparison
Vidu Q4 (reference) vs Wan 3.0
Vidu Q4 (reference) is 5% cheaper (price per second at 720p: Vidu Q4 (reference) $0.24/s vs Wan 3.0 $0.25/s). Vidu Q4 (reference) has faster renders, a higher top resolution and more reference images. Wan 3.0 has the cheapest clip and longer clips.
| Price | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cheapest second | $0.11/s (best) | $0.13/s |
| Per second at 480p | $0.11/s (best) | $0.13/s |
| Per second at 720p | $0.24/s (best) | $0.25/s |
| Per second at 1080p | $0.31/s (best) | $0.51/s |
| Per second at 2K | $0.48/s | Not offered |
| Per second at 4K | $0.99/s | Not offered |
| Cheapest clip | $0.35 | $0.26 (best) |
| A 5-second clip at 720p | $1.21 (best) | $1.28 |
| A 10-second clip at 1080p | $3.06 (best) | $5.10 |
| Speed and length | ||
| Render time | ~2 min (best) | ~2–7 min |
| Longest clip | 16s | 30s (best) |
| Clip lengths | 3–16s | 2–30s |
| Output | ||
| Top resolution | 4K (best) | 1080P |
| Frames | 16:9 · 9:16 · 4:3 · 3:4 · 1:1 | 16:9 · 4:3 · 1:1 · 3:4 · 9:16 |
| Sound | Native | Native |
| Inputs | ||
| Takes | 12Text · 12 images · audio | 10Text · 10 images · 1 video · audio |
| Reference images | Up to 12 (best) | Up to 10 |
| Needs | A start image | A prompt |
| What it does | ||
| Can do | Image → videoMulti-referenceAudio-driven | Text → videoImage → videoFirst + last frameMulti-referenceVideo → videoAudio-driven |
| Good for | — | Value renders · Open ecosystem · Experimentation |
| Settings you control | Frame · Audio · Length · Resolution · Seed | Frame · Audio · Length · Document · Attachment role · Per-attachment roles · Web page · Expand prompt · Resolution · Seed · Watermark |
Same prompt, side by side
None of these models has a render on OpenClips yet.
Which should you choose?
Choose Vidu Q4 (reference) if you want
- a lower price per second at 720p
- faster renders
- a higher top resolution
- more reference images
Choose Wan 3.0 if you want
- the cheapest clip
- longer clips
- text → video, which the other cannot do
- first + last frame, which the other cannot do
- video → video, which the other cannot do
- value renders
- open ecosystem
Compare with others
Vidu Q4 (reference) vs …
Vidu Q4 (reference) vs Seedance 2.5
Vidu Q4 (reference) vs Seedance 2.0
Vidu Q4 (reference) vs Wan 3.0 Prime
Vidu Q4 (reference) vs Pruna P-Video 2 Pro Reference
Vidu Q4 (reference) vs Wan 2.7 (image)
Vidu Q4 (reference) vs MiniMax H3
Wan 3.0 vs Seedance 2.0 Fast
Wan 3.0 vs Kling O1How we compare
- Prices come from the live catalog at the pay-as-you-go rate. The quote before you generate is binding. Plans and packs
- Render times are the catalog’s own estimate for one render.
- Every clip and image on this page was rendered on OpenClips.
Questions
Vidu Q4 (reference) vs Wan 3.0: questions
Vidu Q4 (reference) costs the least here (price per second at 720p). Vidu Q4 (reference): $0.24/s. Wan 3.0: $0.25/s. Prices are at the pay-as-you-go rate. The quote before you generate is binding.
Vidu Q4 (reference) is the fastest here. Vidu Q4 (reference) takes ~2 min. Wan 3.0 takes ~2–7 min.
Vidu Q4 (reference) and Wan 3.0 take a still as the first frame or a reference.
Vidu Q4 (reference) makes up to 16 seconds. Wan 3.0 makes up to 30 seconds.
Vidu Q4 (reference) and Wan 3.0 render native audio with the picture.