AI video model comparison
Vidu Q4 (reference) vs Wan 2.7 (image)
Vidu Q4 (reference) is 5% cheaper (price per second at 720p: Vidu Q4 (reference) $0.24/s vs Wan 2.7 (image) $0.25/s). Vidu Q4 (reference) has the cheapest clip, longer clips, a higher top resolution, more reference images and native audio. Wan 2.7 (image) has faster renders.
| Price | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cheapest second | $0.11/s (best) | $0.25/s |
| Per second at 480p | $0.11/s | Not offered |
| Per second at 720p | $0.24/s (best) | $0.25/s |
| Per second at 1080p | $0.31/s (best) | $0.38/s |
| Per second at 2K | $0.48/s | Not offered |
| Per second at 4K | $0.99/s | Not offered |
| Cheapest clip | $0.35 (best) | $0.51 |
| A 5-second clip at 720p | $1.21 (best) | $1.28 |
| A 10-second clip at 1080p | $3.06 (best) | $3.83 |
| Speed and length | ||
| Render time | ~2 min | ~1–2 min (best) |
| Longest clip | 16s (best) | 15s |
| Clip lengths | 3–16s | 2–15s |
| Output | ||
| Top resolution | 4K (best) | 1080P |
| Frames | 16:9 · 9:16 · 4:3 · 3:4 · 1:1 | Model default |
| Sound | Native (best) | — |
| Inputs | ||
| Takes | 12Text · 12 images · audio | 2Text · 2 images · 1 video · audio |
| Reference images | Up to 12 (best) | Up to 2 |
| Needs | A start image | A start image |
| What it does | ||
| Can do | Image → videoMulti-referenceAudio-driven | Image → videoMulti-referenceVideo → videoAudio-driven |
| Good for | — | Value renders · Open ecosystem · Experimentation |
| Settings you control | Frame · Audio · Length · Resolution · Seed | Length · Negative prompt · Expand prompt · Resolution · Seed · Watermark |
Same prompt, side by side
None of these models has a render on OpenClips yet.
Which should you choose?
Choose Vidu Q4 (reference) if you want
- a lower price per second at 720p
- the cheapest clip
- longer clips
- a higher top resolution
- more reference images
- native audio
Choose Wan 2.7 (image) if you want
- faster renders
- video → video, which the other cannot do
- value renders
- open ecosystem
Compare with others
Vidu Q4 (reference) vs …
Vidu Q4 (reference) vs Wan 3.0
Vidu Q4 (reference) vs Seedance 2.5
Vidu Q4 (reference) vs Seedance 2.0
Vidu Q4 (reference) vs Wan 3.0 Prime
Vidu Q4 (reference) vs Pruna P-Video 2 Pro Reference
Vidu Q4 (reference) vs MiniMax H3
Wan 2.7 (image) vs MiniMax H3 Max (reference)How we compare
- Prices come from the live catalog at the pay-as-you-go rate. The quote before you generate is binding. Plans and packs
- Render times are the catalog’s own estimate for one render.
- Every clip and image on this page was rendered on OpenClips.
Questions
Vidu Q4 (reference) vs Wan 2.7 (image): questions
Vidu Q4 (reference) costs the least here (price per second at 720p). Vidu Q4 (reference): $0.24/s. Wan 2.7 (image): $0.25/s. Prices are at the pay-as-you-go rate. The quote before you generate is binding.
Wan 2.7 (image) is the fastest here. Vidu Q4 (reference) takes ~2 min. Wan 2.7 (image) takes ~1–2 min.
Vidu Q4 (reference) and Wan 2.7 (image) take a still as the first frame or a reference.
Vidu Q4 (reference) makes up to 16 seconds. Wan 2.7 (image) makes up to 15 seconds.
Vidu Q4 (reference) renders native audio with the picture. Wan 2.7 (image): silent.